The Woman Inc.

Portrayal Of Women In Hindu Epics

image

Poornima Laxmeshwar takes a look at three iconic protagonists of Hindu Epics and unravels the spool of women identity the way it existed a long time ago.

Indian Mythology is rife with women characters true to the values of the times in which they occurred and were recorded. Though some of the female characters display a feminist spark, verve and defiance, the trend really is towards submissiveness and obedience. Manusmriti, considered to be the referring guide of code of conduct for women has been appreciated by few scholars, feminists but discarded by the rest.

The two major Hindu epics Ramayana and Mahabharata were written by men in the patriarchal system. It is largely believed that the epics were also interpreted and transmitted by a particular class of men, the Brahmins, who had vested interest both in maintaining their status and in controlling the female population. Women were not allowed to read or hear the scriptures as per the rules across all classes of the society. This gave the men immense freedom where the women lost any chance to disagree to anything that was being addressed and thus, created enough monopoly to shape the mythological characters as per the will of the men.

Sita: The first trait that strikes us when we hear Sita’s name is that of submissiveness. But what is noteworthy is that even though Rama was adamant about going to Vanavas alone, Sita challenged him. She did not heed his command and firmly followed him to the forest. At the end of the epic drama, when Rama refused to believe her chastity and asked her to take the Agni Pariksha for the second time, Sita agreed but decided to never return to Rama despite several pleas from him. These incidents suggest that Sita had a mind of her own and did what any wise woman would have done. Though there have been instances that her second Agni Pariksha was entirely removed from few scriptures to appease the patriarchal society what cannot be ignored is that she was an intelligent woman who was unafraid to stand for what was right.

Draupadi: Wife of the five Pandava brothers, Draupadi is known for her well rounded, intelligent and spirited character though not exactly ‘ideal’ as per the societal norms. Draupadi, who represents the most famous case of polyandry in Indian mythology, has an interesting background. Shared by the brothers in a cyclic manner, Draupadi is portrayed as having excellent wifely skills who never fails to please her husbands. Every husband got to spend one entire year with her while others waited for four years for the next turn. No other brother would intervene during this period and the arrangement was made keeping privacy and emotions of everyone involved. But when compared to any other female mythological character Draupadi is not the one who takes suffering easily. Her interest and discussions about Dharma often reflect her keen interest in philosophy and knowledge. Yudhishthira is very supportive of her opinions and encourages their discussions which may be why she is so articulate. But when he stakes her in the gambling, she questions his right. She is unforgiving and pledges revenge.

Kunti: Daughter of King Sura and wife of the king of Hastinapur, Pandu, Kunti has a life full of ups and downs. Kunti upon being reminded of her maternal responsibility chose not to jump in her husband’s pyre and chose to take care of her children instead. The decision wasn’t easy but she made sure that her sons had a good upbringing despite the negativity that they faced with their enemies Kauravas around. And throughout this period, she stood with patience and perseverance in a way befitting Kshatriya dharma.
One of the most controversial point in Kunti’s story is that Kunti purposely didn’t go back on her decision to make Draupadi the common wife of her five sons even after realising that Arjuna was talking about a person and not an object. It is said that she wanted to bind her sons and having five separate wives would have made that difficult. It is also important to know that wwhile Kunti  was indifferent to the loss of Indraprastha she was aggrieved with the manner in which Draupadi was treated. She provoked her sons to fight for justice even if that could lead to war against family and friends.

If you notice, the women characters in Indian mythology have traits that  surprise us at times and at other times appear inexplicable. The fact is that that these characters were curated and edited to suit the needs of a patriarchal society. While Sita has been hailed for her sacrificing nature, Draupadi has been known for her sharp oratory and comments and has been branded as being the centrifugal force that caused the Mahabharata. The epics have survived several revisions that ride high on opinions. Hindu religion through its mythology and epics, continues to keep the women at a subjugated level.

However, there have been instances which indicate that these women had a will of their own too. But it is immediately  established that the consequences of defiance are brutal, punishing and unforgivable. For instance, Sita did not adhere to Laxman’s instructions of staying within the boundary drawn by him and hence was subjected to suffering and ridicule. Also, another noted example is of Ahilya who was cursed by her saint husband on charges of infidelity and turned to stone. There’s an important lesson lurking here somewhere which our epics are trying to convey even up until these modern times. Are we missing a point somewhere? Or are we now trying to establish that women have the right to defy norms and procedures and are well equipped to bear the consequences of their actions. Or more primarily, do there need to be consequences at all? The point is open to debate.

Citing examples of cases from mythology where when women defy, the consequences are always negative, are now being challenged by contemporary writers. While the famous characters discussed above have enjoyed the limelight, books like Sita’s Sister and Karna’s Wife, Yuganta, Yajnaseni explore other important characters and voice out their injustices with equal importance and compassion. Even Chitra Divakaruni’s The Palace of Illusions talk openly about Draupadi’s love for Karna and gives a view of Mahabharata as imagined by her. Hopefully, this movement will retain its momentum and tell the world what a woman’s actual potential is.

*******

image

 

Poornima is a Freelance content writer, Academic and Research writer and Proofreader based in Bangalore.

 

Cover Design: Vinita Agrawal

 

 

Advertisements

7 comments on “Portrayal Of Women In Hindu Epics

  1. Bonani Dhar
    February 20, 2017

    Dear Poornima, the topic you selected is interesting indeed.The women in the Indian Hindu mythology faced stages of male dominance as well as support. However, unfortunately both Sita and Draupadi did go through direspectful situations. Particularly Daraupadi’s ‘cheer haran’ when she was being humiliated by men in the Raj Sabha. Sita was abducted by Ravan.
    The point at issue is that if these sacred books depict such disrespect towards women then how is it goining to be a lesson in social reforms?

    Like

    • blackjack20
      February 20, 2017

      When Miss Khobragade, an Indian diplomat and thus a representative of the country, was “cavity checked” (i.e. penetrated) by US officials, the response from “modern” India was zilch. When Draupadi was disrobed, it started a war. That is the status women enjoyed in ancient India.

      Besides, the “evidence” that the author presents is so completely anecdotal and yet the claim she makes is on an entire epoch in history! It is as though the 21st century be judged by one Nirbhaya rape, forgetting all else. To make such a claim a clear pattern has to be established through umpteen examples from various texts across the geography including in Tamil, Odiya, Kannada, Malayalam at the very least — and not just from Sanskrit texts — since ancient India is reflected as much in these age-old languages, as also in several others. Sadly, the author does little else than indulging in virtue-signalling.

      Like

      • editorwomaninc
        February 21, 2017

        Thank you for reading the essay blackjack and for leaving comments. The purpose of the article is to highlight the characters of women in Hindu epics of which the Ramayana and the Mahabharata are most popular. Indeed it would be great if the writer had quoted, analysed and summarized women characters from regional literature as well. But, you have to concede that we are referring to ancient and earliest epics here. Most of these were written in Sanskrit which was the common language of that era. Yes other languages existed and were spoken, but most written records were in Sanskrit. Honestly, touching upon a broader base of vernacular literature was for the time being, beyond the scope of this essay.

        Like

    • editorwomaninc
      February 21, 2017

      Blackjack, Draupadi was a Yajnaseni – born from the sacred fire, she emerged perfectly wise in a youthful form. Her wisdom, her knowledge was innate, inbuilt – asked for by her father so that she could reinstate dharma on earth.

      Liked by 1 person

    • editorwomaninc
      February 21, 2017

      That’s a valid point Bonani. Sometimes our mythology becomes a reference point for what NOT to do. Hence quoting them, discussing them and highlighting their anecdotes becomes perpetually relevant.

      Like

  2. blackjack20
    February 20, 2017

    i wonder how when women weren’t allowed to read and gain knowledge, when in the case of Draupadi: ‘Her interest and discussions about Dharma often reflect her keen interest in philosophy and knowledge. Yudhishthira is very supportive of her opinions and encourages their discussions which may be why she is so articulate.’ Remember that Yudhishthira is the very embodiment of dharma, and being so supports her.

    Like

    • Poorni
      February 20, 2017

      Draupadi discusses dharma as a personal application and to understand
      the workings of the universe. Therefore, her interest, while personal, can also be
      classified as intellectual and philosophical. For example, she engages in discus
      sions with Yudhishthira about fate and why the good suffer. These discussions
      suggest a sophistication of thought that Sita does not articulate. Please read this paper.

      http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wd7z439

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 20, 2017 by .
%d bloggers like this: